IDA only vs Macao: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square

IDA only
2.25 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Macao
1,000 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
IDA only rank
5th
Macao rank
3rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square over time

  • IDA only
  • Macao
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019892008

How they compare

Macao currently reports 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA only, a difference of 997.75 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macao's figure about 444.3 times IDA only's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.

IDA only ranks 5th and Macao ranks 3rd of 47 groups.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA only Macao Difference Ahead
1970s 0.9574 current US$ per square kilometre 500 current US$ per square kilometre 499.04 current US$ per square kilometre Macao
1980s 3.97 current US$ per square kilometre 1,400 current US$ per square kilometre 1,396 current US$ per square kilometre Macao
1990s 5.64 current US$ per square kilometre 1,571 current US$ per square kilometre 1,566 current US$ per square kilometre Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, IDA only or Macao?
Macao, at 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA only as of 1999.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between IDA only and Macao?
997.75 current US$ per square kilometre, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Macao?
13 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 1999.
How do IDA only and Macao rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
IDA only ranks 5th and Macao ranks 3rd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA only vs Macao: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-only/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-only/macao-sar-china/">IDA only vs Macao: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.