IDA only vs Macau, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

IDA only
2.25 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Macau, China
1,000 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
IDA only rank
5th
Macau, China rank
3rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • IDA only
  • Macau, China
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019892008

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA only, a difference of 997.75 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 444.3 times IDA only's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

IDA only ranks 5th and Macau, China ranks 3rd of 47 groups.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA only Macau, China Difference Ahead
1970s 0.9574 current US$ per square kilometre 500 current US$ per square kilometre 499.04 current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1980s 3.97 current US$ per square kilometre 1,400 current US$ per square kilometre 1,396 current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1990s 5.64 current US$ per square kilometre 1,571 current US$ per square kilometre 1,566 current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, IDA only or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA only as of 1999.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between IDA only and Macau, China?
997.75 current US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Macau, China?
13 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 1999.
How do IDA only and Macau, China rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
IDA only ranks 5th and Macau, China ranks 3rd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA only vs Macau, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-only/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-only/macao-sar-china/">IDA only vs Macau, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.