Kiribati vs OECD members: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Kiribati
49.38 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
OECD members
0.1158 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Kiribati rank
29th
OECD members rank
28th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Kiribati
  • OECD members
02004006008001.0k196919882008

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 49.38 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.1158 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 49.26 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 426.4 times OECD members's.

Across all 37 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 29th and OECD members ranks 28th of 169 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 48.01 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0674 current US$ per square kilometre 47.94 current US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
1980s 267.49 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1519 current US$ per square kilometre 267.34 current US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
1990s 450.62 current US$ per square kilometre 0.365 current US$ per square kilometre 450.25 current US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
2000s 552.81 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2828 current US$ per square kilometre 552.53 current US$ per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Kiribati or OECD members?
Kiribati, at 49.38 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.1158 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Kiribati and OECD members?
49.26 current US$ per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and OECD members?
37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2008.
How do Kiribati and OECD members rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Kiribati ranks 29th and OECD members ranks 28th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs OECD members: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/oecd-members/">Kiribati vs OECD members: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.