Macau, China vs Pacific island small states: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Macau, China
1,000 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Pacific island small states
14.49 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Macau, China rank
3rd
Pacific island small states rank
2nd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Macau, China
  • Pacific island small states
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019892008

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 14.49 current US$ per square kilometre in Pacific island small states, a difference of 985.51 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 69.0 times Pacific island small states's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

Macau, China ranks 3rd and Pacific island small states ranks 2nd of 169 countries.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China Pacific island small states Difference Ahead
1970s 500 current US$ per square kilometre 7.95 current US$ per square kilometre 492.05 current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1980s 1,400 current US$ per square kilometre 51.16 current US$ per square kilometre 1,349 current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1990s 1,571 current US$ per square kilometre 89.43 current US$ per square kilometre 1,482 current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Macau, China or Pacific island small states?
Macau, China, at 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 14.49 current US$ per square kilometre in Pacific island small states as of 1999.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Macau, China and Pacific island small states?
985.51 current US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Pacific island small states?
13 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 1999.
How do Macau, China and Pacific island small states rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Macau, China ranks 3rd and Pacific island small states ranks 2nd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs Pacific island small states: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/pacific-island-small-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/pacific-island-small-states/">Macau, China vs Pacific island small states: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.