Macao vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square

Macao
1,000 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1,423 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Macao rank
3rd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
2nd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square over time

  • Macao
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
01.0k2.0k3.0k197219902008

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 1,423 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre in Macao, a difference of 423 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.4 times Macao's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.

Macao ranks 3rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 2nd of 169 countries.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1980s 1,400 current US$ per square kilometre 346.15 current US$ per square kilometre 1,054 current US$ per square kilometre Macao
1990s 1,571 current US$ per square kilometre 626.37 current US$ per square kilometre 945.06 current US$ per square kilometre Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Macao or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 1,423 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre in Macao as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Macao and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
423 current US$ per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
12 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 1999.
How do Macao and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Macao ranks 3rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 2nd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macao vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Macao vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.