Macao vs Tuvalu: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square

Macao
1,000 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Tuvalu
1,000 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Macao rank
3rd
Tuvalu rank
3rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square over time

  • Macao
  • Tuvalu
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197219902008

How they compare

Macao currently reports 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Macao ahead.

Macao ranks 3rd and Tuvalu ranks 3rd of 169 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Macao averaged higher in 1 and Tuvalu in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1980s 1,400 current US$ per square kilometre 533.33 current US$ per square kilometre 866.67 current US$ per square kilometre Macao
1990s 1,571 current US$ per square kilometre 2,952 current US$ per square kilometre 1,381 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Macao or Tuvalu?
Macao, at 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre in Tuvalu as of 1999.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Macao and Tuvalu?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Tuvalu?
12 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 1999.
How do Macao and Tuvalu rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Macao ranks 3rd and Tuvalu ranks 3rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macao vs Tuvalu: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/tuvalu/">Macao vs Tuvalu: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.