Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Mauritius
285.71 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Sao Tome and Principe
208.33 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Mauritius rank
15th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
17th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Mauritius
  • Sao Tome and Principe
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196919882008

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 285.71 current US$ per square kilometre against 208.33 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 77.38 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.4 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Mauritius ranks 15th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 17th of 169 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 40.64 current US$ per square kilometre 213.54 current US$ per square kilometre 172.9 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 178.33 current US$ per square kilometre 464.58 current US$ per square kilometre 286.26 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 383.74 current US$ per square kilometre 929.17 current US$ per square kilometre 545.42 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 505.2 current US$ per square kilometre 1,044 current US$ per square kilometre 538.78 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Mauritius or Sao Tome and Principe?
Mauritius, at 285.71 current US$ per square kilometre against 208.33 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
77.38 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
33 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2008.
How do Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Mauritius ranks 15th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 17th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/sao-tome-and-principe/">Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.