Micronesia, Federated States of vs OECD members: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Micronesia, Federated States of
42.86 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
OECD members
0.1158 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
31st
OECD members rank
28th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Micronesia, Federated States of
  • OECD members
0200400600197019892008

How they compare

Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 42.86 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.1158 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 42.74 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Micronesia, Federated States of's figure about 370.0 times OECD members's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Micronesia, Federated States of has been ahead every year.

Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 31st and OECD members ranks 28th of 169 countries.

Micronesia, Federated States of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia, Federated States of OECD members Difference Ahead
1990s 294.64 current US$ per square kilometre 0.386 current US$ per square kilometre 294.26 current US$ per square kilometre Micronesia, Federated States of
2000s 301.59 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2828 current US$ per square kilometre 301.3 current US$ per square kilometre Micronesia, Federated States of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Micronesia, Federated States of or OECD members?
Micronesia, Federated States of, at 42.86 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.1158 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Micronesia, Federated States of and OECD members?
42.74 current US$ per square kilometre, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and OECD members?
17 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2008.
How do Micronesia, Federated States of and OECD members rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 31st and OECD members ranks 28th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia, Federated States of vs OECD members: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/micronesia-fed-sts/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/micronesia-fed-sts/oecd-members/">Micronesia, Federated States of vs OECD members: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.