Nauru vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square

Nauru
2,500 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1,423 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Nauru rank
1st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
2nd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square over time

  • Nauru
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k198419962008

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 2,500 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,423 current US$ per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 1,077 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1.8 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Nauru ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 2nd of 169 countries.

Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1990s 2,833 current US$ per square kilometre 807.69 current US$ per square kilometre 2,026 current US$ per square kilometre Nauru
2000s 5,643 current US$ per square kilometre 807.69 current US$ per square kilometre 4,835 current US$ per square kilometre Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Nauru or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Nauru, at 2,500 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,423 current US$ per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Nauru and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
1,077 current US$ per square kilometre, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
10 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2008.
How do Nauru and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Nauru ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 2nd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/naoero/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/naoero/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Nauru vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.