Nauru vs Tuvalu: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square

Nauru
2,500 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Tuvalu
1,000 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Nauru rank
1st
Tuvalu rank
3rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square over time

  • Nauru
  • Tuvalu
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197519912008

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 2,500 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre in Tuvalu, a difference of 1,500 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nauru's figure about 2.5 times Tuvalu's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Tuvalu ahead.

Nauru ranks 1st and Tuvalu ranks 3rd of 169 countries.

Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1990s 2,833 current US$ per square kilometre 1,444 current US$ per square kilometre 1,389 current US$ per square kilometre Nauru
2000s 5,438 current US$ per square kilometre 3,375 current US$ per square kilometre 2,063 current US$ per square kilometre Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Nauru or Tuvalu?
Nauru, at 2,500 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre in Tuvalu as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Nauru and Tuvalu?
1,500 current US$ per square kilometre, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Tuvalu?
11 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2008.
How do Nauru and Tuvalu rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Nauru ranks 1st and Tuvalu ranks 3rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Tuvalu: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/naoero/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/naoero/tuvalu/">Nauru vs Tuvalu: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.