New Caledonia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

New Caledonia
1.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Tanzania, United Republic of
1.21 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
New Caledonia rank
128th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
127th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
012345196919882008

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.12 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 128th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 127th of 169 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1970s 0.8206 current US$ per square kilometre 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2745 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 0.9573 current US$ per square kilometre 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre 3.15 current US$ per square kilometre 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, New Caledonia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between New Caledonia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.12 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
10 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 1999.
How do New Caledonia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
New Caledonia ranks 128th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 127th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/tanzania/">New Caledonia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.