Poland vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Poland
1.63 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Zimbabwe
1.4 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Poland rank
120th
Zimbabwe rank
123rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Poland
  • Zimbabwe
02468197219902008

How they compare

Poland currently reports 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.23 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.

Poland ranks 120th and Zimbabwe ranks 123rd of 169 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 3.55 current US$ per square kilometre 4.37 current US$ per square kilometre 0.82 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre 5.85 current US$ per square kilometre 3.27 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Poland or Zimbabwe?
Poland, at 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2004.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Poland and Zimbabwe?
0.23 current US$ per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Zimbabwe?
14 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
How do Poland and Zimbabwe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Poland ranks 120th and Zimbabwe ranks 123rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/poland/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/poland/zimbabwe/">Poland vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.