China vs Hong Kong, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per unit of

China
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2008
Hong Kong, China
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 1996
China rank
166th
Hong Kong, China rank
168th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per unit of over time

  • China
  • Hong Kong, China
00000196919882008

How they compare

China currently reports 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes China's figure about 2.5 times Hong Kong, China's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 166th and Hong Kong, China ranks 168th of 168 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP China
1980s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP China
1990s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per unit of, China or Hong Kong, China?
China, at 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Hong Kong, China as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per unit of between China and Hong Kong, China?
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Hong Kong, China?
17 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 1996.
How do China and Hong Kong, China rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per unit of?
China ranks 166th and Hong Kong, China ranks 168th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Hong Kong, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per unit of. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/china/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/china/hong-kong-sar-china/">China vs Hong Kong, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per unit of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 7,224 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.