East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Mongolia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per unit of

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2008
Mongolia
0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2008
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
23rd
Mongolia rank
24th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per unit of over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Mongolia
00.0010.0020.003197019892008

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 102.4 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 23rd and Mongolia ranks 24th of 47 groups.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Mongolia Difference Ahead
1980s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP Mongolia
1990s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0018 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0017 current US$ per US$ of GDP Mongolia
2000s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0013 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0013 current US$ per US$ of GDP Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per unit of, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per unit of between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Mongolia?
0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Mongolia?
24 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2008.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Mongolia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per unit of?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 23rd and Mongolia ranks 24th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Mongolia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per unit of. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/mongolia/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Mongolia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per unit of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 7,224 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.