Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per unit of

Malawi
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2008
Zimbabwe
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2008
Malawi rank
38th
Zimbabwe rank
39th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per unit of over time

  • Malawi
  • Zimbabwe
000.0010.0010.0010.001197219902008

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 39th of 168 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP Malawi
1990s 0.0006 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP Malawi
2000s 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per unit of, Malawi or Zimbabwe?
Malawi, at 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per unit of between Malawi and Zimbabwe?
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?
28 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2008.
How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per unit of?
Malawi ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 39th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per unit of. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/malawi/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/malawi/zimbabwe/">Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per unit of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 7,224 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.