Hong Kong, China vs Tuvalu: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA

Hong Kong, China
30,000 current US$
in 1996
Tuvalu
30,000 current US$
in 2008
Hong Kong, China rank
162nd
Tuvalu rank
162nd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Tuvalu
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196919882008

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 30,000 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 162nd and Tuvalu ranks 162nd of 172 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1970s 60,000 current US$ 26,000 current US$ 34,000 current US$ Hong Kong, China
1980s 60,000 current US$ 17,500 current US$ 42,500 current US$ Hong Kong, China
1990s 92,857 current US$ 77,143 current US$ 15,714 current US$ Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta, Hong Kong, China or Tuvalu?
Hong Kong, China, at 30,000 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in Tuvalu as of 1996.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta between Hong Kong, China and Tuvalu?
0 current US$, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Tuvalu?
20 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 1996.
How do Hong Kong, China and Tuvalu rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta?
Hong Kong, China ranks 162nd and Tuvalu ranks 162nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Tuvalu: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us/hong-kong-sar-china/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us/hong-kong-sar-china/tuvalu/">Hong Kong, China vs Tuvalu: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 7,561 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies are the net disbursements of total official flows from the UN agencies. Total official flows are the sum of Official Development Assistance (ODA) or official aid and Other Official Flows (OOF) and represent the total disbursements by the official sector at large to the recipient country. Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. OOF are transactions by the official sector whose main objective is other than development-motivated, or, if development-motivated, whose grant element is below the 25 per cent threshold which would make them eligible to be recorded as ODA. The main classes of transactions included here are official export credits, official sector equity and portfolio investment, and debt reorganization undertaken by the official sector at nonconcessional terms (irrespective of the nature or the identity of the original creditor). UN agencies are United Nations includes the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), World Food Programme (WFP), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), United Nations Development Programme(UNDP), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), United Nations Regular Programme for Technical Assistance (UNTA), United Nations Peacebuilding Fund (UNPBF), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Labour Organization (ILO), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) and United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR). Data are in current U.S. dollars.