East Asia & Pacific vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), annual growth

East Asia & Pacific
-4.71 % change on previous year
in 2023
Eswatini
54.73 % change on previous year
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
29th
Eswatini rank
30th

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), annual growth over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Eswatini
0200400600800197019962023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 54.73 % change on previous year against -4.71 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 59.44 % change on previous year.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 11.6 times East Asia & Pacific's.

The two have swapped places 26 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Eswatini ahead.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 29th and Eswatini ranks 30th of 45 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 43.32 % change on previous year 39.76 % change on previous year 3.56 % change on previous year East Asia & Pacific
1980s -3.04 % change on previous year 66.87 % change on previous year 69.91 % change on previous year Eswatini
1990s 11.53 % change on previous year 19.56 % change on previous year 8.03 % change on previous year Eswatini
2000s 13.56 % change on previous year 275.32 % change on previous year 261.76 % change on previous year Eswatini
2010s 11.51 % change on previous year 38.98 % change on previous year 27.47 % change on previous year Eswatini
2020s -9.4 % change on previous year 135.02 % change on previous year 144.42 % change on previous year Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), annual growth, East Asia & Pacific or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 54.73 % change on previous year against -4.71 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), annual growth between East Asia & Pacific and Eswatini?
59.44 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Eswatini?
42 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Eswatini rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), annual growth?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 29th and Eswatini ranks 30th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-annual-growth-rate/east-asia-and-pacific/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-annual-growth-rate/east-asia-and-pacific/eswatini/">East Asia & Pacific vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 6,246 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.