Bangladesh vs China: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), gaps filled

Bangladesh
7.77 million current US$
in 2023
China
8.00 million current US$
in 2005
Bangladesh rank
19th
China rank
18th

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Bangladesh
  • China
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M197219972023

How they compare

China currently reports 8.00 million current US$ against 7.77 million current US$ in Bangladesh, a difference of 226,340 current US$.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 19th and China ranks 18th of 124 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 3 and China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh China Difference Ahead
1970s 36.74 million current US$ 3.48 million current US$ 33.26 million current US$ Bangladesh
1980s 42.96 million current US$ 49.82 million current US$ 6.86 million current US$ China
1990s 39.03 million current US$ 18.04 million current US$ 20.98 million current US$ Bangladesh
2000s 17.02 million current US$ 9.29 million current US$ 7.73 million current US$ Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), gaps filled, Bangladesh or China?
China, at 8.00 million current US$ against 7.77 million current US$ in Bangladesh as of 2005.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), gaps filled between Bangladesh and China?
226,340 current US$, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and China?
27 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2005.
How do Bangladesh and China rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), gaps filled?
Bangladesh ranks 19th and China ranks 18th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs China: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-gaps-filled/bangladesh/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-gaps-filled/bangladesh/china/">Bangladesh vs China: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 7,017 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) with 192 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.