Cuba vs Russia: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), gaps filled
Cuba
1.39 million current US$
in 2023
Russia
1.55 million current US$
in 2004
Cuba rank
64th
Russia rank
61st
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Cuba
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 1.55 million current US$ against 1.39 million current US$ in Cuba, a difference of 161,680 current US$.
That makes Russia's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 64th and Russia ranks 61st of 124 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.75 million current US$ | 2.58 million current US$ | 3.17 million current US$ | Cuba |
| 2000s | 2.37 million current US$ | 1.35 million current US$ | 1.01 million current US$ | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), gaps filled, Cuba or Russia?
- Russia, at 1.55 million current US$ against 1.39 million current US$ in Cuba as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), gaps filled between Cuba and Russia?
- 161,680 current US$, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Russia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2004.
- How do Cuba and Russia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), gaps filled?
- Cuba ranks 64th and Russia ranks 61st of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) with 192 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.