Central African Republic vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per capita

Central African Republic
2.43 current US$ per person
in 2023
Eswatini
1.44 current US$ per person
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
8th
Eswatini rank
11th

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per capita over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Eswatini
02468196919962023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 2.43 current US$ per person against 1.44 current US$ per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0.99 current US$ per person.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.7 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Eswatini ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 8th and Eswatini ranks 11th of 124 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 0.2436 current US$ per person 1.42 current US$ per person 1.18 current US$ per person Eswatini
1980s 0.5345 current US$ per person 2.49 current US$ per person 1.96 current US$ per person Eswatini
1990s 1.02 current US$ per person 4.08 current US$ per person 3.06 current US$ per person Eswatini
2000s 0.8143 current US$ per person 0.5231 current US$ per person 0.2912 current US$ per person Central African Republic
2010s 1.16 current US$ per person 0.6904 current US$ per person 0.4728 current US$ per person Central African Republic
2020s 1.98 current US$ per person 1.79 current US$ per person 0.1912 current US$ per person Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per capita, Central African Republic or Eswatini?
Central African Republic, at 2.43 current US$ per person against 1.44 current US$ per person in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per capita between Central African Republic and Eswatini?
0.99 current US$ per person, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Eswatini?
45 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Eswatini rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per capita?
Central African Republic ranks 8th and Eswatini ranks 11th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-capita/central-african-republic/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-capita/central-african-republic/eswatini/">Central African Republic vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 6,825 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.