Equatorial Guinea vs Samoa: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per capita

Equatorial Guinea
3.92 current US$ per person
in 1995
Samoa
8.1 current US$ per person
in 1992
Equatorial Guinea rank
3rd
Samoa rank
2nd

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per capita over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Samoa
02468196919821995

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 8.1 current US$ per person against 3.92 current US$ per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 4.18 current US$ per person.

That makes Samoa's figure about 2.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 3rd and Samoa ranks 2nd of 124 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Samoa Difference Ahead
1980s 5.39 current US$ per person 0.9525 current US$ per person 4.43 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 4.29 current US$ per person 4.89 current US$ per person 0.5983 current US$ per person Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Samoa?
Samoa, at 8.1 current US$ per person against 3.92 current US$ per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 1992.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Samoa?
4.18 current US$ per person, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Samoa?
7 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 1992.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Samoa rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per capita?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 3rd and Samoa ranks 2nd of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Samoa: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/samoa/">Equatorial Guinea vs Samoa: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 6,825 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.