Afghanistan vs Malawi: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square

Afghanistan
45.19 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
47.54 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
31st
Malawi rank
28th

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Malawi
05001.0k1.5k196919962023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 47.54 current US$ per square kilometre against 45.19 current US$ per square kilometre in Afghanistan, a difference of 2.35 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Malawi ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 31st and Malawi ranks 28th of 123 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6593 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7425 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0832 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1970s 8.3 current US$ per square kilometre 11.12 current US$ per square kilometre 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 8.06 current US$ per square kilometre 88.61 current US$ per square kilometre 80.55 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 28.05 current US$ per square kilometre 411.26 current US$ per square kilometre 383.21 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 4.01 current US$ per square kilometre 54.97 current US$ per square kilometre 50.96 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 11.07 current US$ per square kilometre 45.75 current US$ per square kilometre 34.68 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 27.46 current US$ per square kilometre 48.81 current US$ per square kilometre 21.34 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square, Afghanistan or Malawi?
Malawi, at 47.54 current US$ per square kilometre against 45.19 current US$ per square kilometre in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square between Afghanistan and Malawi?
2.35 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Malawi?
52 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Malawi rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square?
Afghanistan ranks 31st and Malawi ranks 28th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Malawi: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/malawi/">Afghanistan vs Malawi: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 6,753 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.