Cape Verde vs Georgia: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square

Cape Verde
2.82 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia
3.32 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2013
Cape Verde rank
83rd
Georgia rank
81st

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Georgia
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k197519992023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 3.32 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.5 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.2 times Cape Verde's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 83rd and Georgia ranks 81st of 123 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,222 current US$ per square kilometre 60.01 current US$ per square kilometre 1,162 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 166.75 current US$ per square kilometre 23.82 current US$ per square kilometre 142.93 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s -2.48 current US$ per square kilometre 7.63 current US$ per square kilometre 10.11 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square, Cape Verde or Georgia?
Georgia, at 3.32 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre in Cape Verde as of 2013.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square between Cape Verde and Georgia?
0.5 current US$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Georgia?
16 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
How do Cape Verde and Georgia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square?
Cape Verde ranks 83rd and Georgia ranks 81st of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Georgia: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/georgia/">Cape Verde vs Georgia: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 6,753 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.