Chile vs Jamaica: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square

Chile
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1994
Jamaica
-1.85 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1998
Chile rank
118th
Jamaica rank
121st

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square over time

  • Chile
  • Jamaica
0200400600196919831998

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against -1.85 current US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 118th and Jamaica ranks 121st of 123 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4976 current US$ per square kilometre 38.78 current US$ per square kilometre 38.28 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre 19.92 current US$ per square kilometre 18.88 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 0.8944 current US$ per square kilometre 214.68 current US$ per square kilometre 213.79 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square, Chile or Jamaica?
Chile, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against -1.85 current US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 1994.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square between Chile and Jamaica?
1.85 current US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Jamaica?
10 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 1994.
How do Chile and Jamaica rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square?
Chile ranks 118th and Jamaica ranks 121st of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Jamaica: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/jamaica/">Chile vs Jamaica: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 6,753 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.