Congo vs Mauritius: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square

Congo
5.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
4.93 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1997
Congo rank
71st
Mauritius rank
73rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square over time

  • Congo
  • Mauritius
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196919962023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 5.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.21 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 71st and Mauritius ranks 73rd of 123 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4978 current US$ per square kilometre 54.19 current US$ per square kilometre 53.69 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 5.09 current US$ per square kilometre 823.65 current US$ per square kilometre 818.56 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 3.56 current US$ per square kilometre 973.18 current US$ per square kilometre 969.62 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 2.22 current US$ per square kilometre 834.15 current US$ per square kilometre 831.94 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square, Congo or Mauritius?
Congo, at 5.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square between Congo and Mauritius?
0.21 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mauritius?
26 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 1995.
How do Congo and Mauritius rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square?
Congo ranks 71st and Mauritius ranks 73rd of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Mauritius: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mauritius/">Congo vs Mauritius: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 6,753 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.