El Salvador vs Malawi: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square

El Salvador
51.17 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
47.54 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
25th
Malawi rank
28th

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square over time

  • El Salvador
  • Malawi
05001.0k1.5k196919962023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 51.17 current US$ per square kilometre against 47.54 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 3.63 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 25th and Malawi ranks 28th of 123 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and Malawi in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 39.31 current US$ per square kilometre 11.12 current US$ per square kilometre 28.2 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 397.78 current US$ per square kilometre 83.78 current US$ per square kilometre 314 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 313.13 current US$ per square kilometre 411.26 current US$ per square kilometre 98.14 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 42.28 current US$ per square kilometre 55.3 current US$ per square kilometre 13.03 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 35.82 current US$ per square kilometre 45.75 current US$ per square kilometre 9.94 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 135.47 current US$ per square kilometre 48.81 current US$ per square kilometre 86.67 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square, El Salvador or Malawi?
El Salvador, at 51.17 current US$ per square kilometre against 47.54 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square between El Salvador and Malawi?
3.63 current US$ per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Malawi?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Malawi rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square?
El Salvador ranks 25th and Malawi ranks 28th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Malawi: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/malawi/">El Salvador vs Malawi: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 6,753 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.