Europe & Central Asia vs South Sudan: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square

Europe & Central Asia
0.2761 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Sudan
27.05 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia rank
38th
South Sudan rank
41st

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • South Sudan
01020304050196919962023

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 27.05 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.2761 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 26.77 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 98.0 times Europe & Central Asia's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 38th and South Sudan ranks 41st of 46 groups.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.1404 current US$ per square kilometre 22.18 current US$ per square kilometre 22.04 current US$ per square kilometre South Sudan
2020s 0.1324 current US$ per square kilometre 21.09 current US$ per square kilometre 20.96 current US$ per square kilometre South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square, Europe & Central Asia or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 27.05 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.2761 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square between Europe & Central Asia and South Sudan?
26.77 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and South Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia and South Sudan rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 38th and South Sudan ranks 41st of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs South Sudan: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/south-sudan/">Europe & Central Asia vs South Sudan: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 6,753 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.