Gambia vs IDA & IBRD total: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square

Gambia
49 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA & IBRD total
3.62 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Gambia rank
27th
IDA & IBRD total rank
24th

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square over time

  • Gambia
  • IDA & IBRD total
0200400600197019962023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 49 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.62 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 45.38 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 13.5 times IDA & IBRD total's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 27th and IDA & IBRD total ranks 24th of 123 countries.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia IDA & IBRD total Difference Ahead
1970s 96.25 current US$ per square kilometre 3.68 current US$ per square kilometre 92.56 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 330.04 current US$ per square kilometre 9.34 current US$ per square kilometre 320.7 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 233.79 current US$ per square kilometre 9.85 current US$ per square kilometre 223.94 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 117.29 current US$ per square kilometre 3.41 current US$ per square kilometre 113.88 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 49.3 current US$ per square kilometre 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre 46.52 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 57.17 current US$ per square kilometre 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre 53.87 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square, Gambia or IDA & IBRD total?
Gambia, at 49 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.62 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square between Gambia and IDA & IBRD total?
45.38 current US$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and IDA & IBRD total?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Gambia and IDA & IBRD total rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square?
Gambia ranks 27th and IDA & IBRD total ranks 24th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs IDA & IBRD total: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/ida-and-ibrd-total/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/ida-and-ibrd-total/">Gambia vs IDA & IBRD total: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 6,753 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.