IDA & IBRD total vs Rwanda: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square

IDA & IBRD total
3.62 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Rwanda
74.81 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA & IBRD total rank
24th
Rwanda rank
21st

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square over time

  • IDA & IBRD total
  • Rwanda
-2.0k02.0k4.0k6.0k197019962023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 74.81 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.62 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 71.19 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 20.7 times IDA & IBRD total's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Rwanda ahead.

IDA & IBRD total ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 21st of 46 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA & IBRD total Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 4.56 current US$ per square kilometre 24.03 current US$ per square kilometre 19.47 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 9.34 current US$ per square kilometre 93.23 current US$ per square kilometre 83.89 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 9.85 current US$ per square kilometre 1,274 current US$ per square kilometre 1,264 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 3.41 current US$ per square kilometre 281.88 current US$ per square kilometre 278.47 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre 95.8 current US$ per square kilometre 92.91 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre 104.66 current US$ per square kilometre 101.35 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square, IDA & IBRD total or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 74.81 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.62 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square between IDA & IBRD total and Rwanda?
71.19 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and Rwanda?
49 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2022.
How do IDA & IBRD total and Rwanda rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square?
IDA & IBRD total ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 21st of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA & IBRD total vs Rwanda: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-and-ibrd-total/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-and-ibrd-total/rwanda/">IDA & IBRD total vs Rwanda: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 6,753 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.