Latin America & Caribbean vs Timor-Leste: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square

Latin America & Caribbean
1.43 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Timor-Leste
45.72 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Latin America & Caribbean rank
30th
Timor-Leste rank
30th

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square over time

  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Timor-Leste
0255075100125196919962023

How they compare

Timor-Leste currently reports 45.72 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.43 current US$ per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean, a difference of 44.29 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 32.0 times Latin America & Caribbean's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Timor-Leste ahead.

Latin America & Caribbean ranks 30th and Timor-Leste ranks 30th of 46 groups.

Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America & Caribbean Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
1990s 2.52 current US$ per square kilometre 117.01 current US$ per square kilometre 114.5 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2000s 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre 18.49 current US$ per square kilometre 17.42 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2010s 0.6153 current US$ per square kilometre 47.81 current US$ per square kilometre 47.19 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2020s 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre 54.91 current US$ per square kilometre 53.62 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square, Latin America & Caribbean or Timor-Leste?
Timor-Leste, at 45.72 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.43 current US$ per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square between Latin America & Caribbean and Timor-Leste?
44.29 current US$ per square kilometre, with Timor-Leste ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & Caribbean and Timor-Leste?
25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
How do Latin America & Caribbean and Timor-Leste rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square?
Latin America & Caribbean ranks 30th and Timor-Leste ranks 30th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America & Caribbean vs Timor-Leste: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/latin-america-and-caribbean/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/latin-america-and-caribbean/timor-leste/">Latin America & Caribbean vs Timor-Leste: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 6,753 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.