Philippines vs Zambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square

Philippines
2.41 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
2.68 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines rank
87th
Zambia rank
84th

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square over time

  • Philippines
  • Zambia
0102030196919962023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 2.68 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.41 current US$ per square kilometre in Philippines, a difference of 0.27 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Philippines ahead.

Philippines ranks 87th and Zambia ranks 84th of 123 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.78 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1345 current US$ per square kilometre 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre Philippines
1970s 7.43 current US$ per square kilometre 1.37 current US$ per square kilometre 6.06 current US$ per square kilometre Philippines
1980s 12.68 current US$ per square kilometre 2.26 current US$ per square kilometre 10.42 current US$ per square kilometre Philippines
1990s 7.13 current US$ per square kilometre 13.4 current US$ per square kilometre 6.27 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 12.66 current US$ per square kilometre 12.02 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6379 current US$ per square kilometre Philippines
2010s 3.74 current US$ per square kilometre 3.84 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1009 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 3.06 current US$ per square kilometre 2.07 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9969 current US$ per square kilometre Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square, Philippines or Zambia?
Zambia, at 2.68 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.41 current US$ per square kilometre in Philippines as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square between Philippines and Zambia?
0.27 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Zambia?
45 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2023.
How do Philippines and Zambia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square?
Philippines ranks 87th and Zambia ranks 84th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Zambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/philippines/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/philippines/zambia/">Philippines vs Zambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 6,753 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.