Tajikistan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square

Tajikistan
5.66 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
5.21 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tajikistan rank
67th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
69th

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square over time

  • Tajikistan
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
020406080196919962023

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.21 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.45 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Tajikistan ahead.

Tajikistan ranks 67th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 69th of 123 countries.

Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 28.91 current US$ per square kilometre 14.55 current US$ per square kilometre 14.37 current US$ per square kilometre Tajikistan
2000s 22.5 current US$ per square kilometre 7.32 current US$ per square kilometre 15.18 current US$ per square kilometre Tajikistan
2010s 9.89 current US$ per square kilometre 3.51 current US$ per square kilometre 6.38 current US$ per square kilometre Tajikistan
2020s 7.82 current US$ per square kilometre 3.82 current US$ per square kilometre 3.99 current US$ per square kilometre Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square, Tajikistan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tajikistan, at 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.21 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square between Tajikistan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.45 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Tajikistan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per square?
Tajikistan ranks 67th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 69th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tajikistan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/tajikistan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/tajikistan/tanzania/">Tajikistan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 6,753 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.