Early-demographic dividend vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per unit of

Early-demographic dividend
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Eswatini
0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Early-demographic dividend rank
21st
Eswatini rank
24th

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per unit of over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Eswatini
00.0020.0040.006197019962023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 33.6 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 45 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 21st and Eswatini ranks 24th of 46 groups.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0031 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0029 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini
1980s 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0031 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0029 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini
1990s 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.003 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0027 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini
2000s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini
2010s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini
2020s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per unit of, Early-demographic dividend or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Early-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per unit of between Early-demographic dividend and Eswatini?
0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Eswatini?
45 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Eswatini rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, wfp (current us$), per unit of?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 21st and Eswatini ranks 24th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per unit of. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/early-demographic-dividend/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-wfp-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/early-demographic-dividend/eswatini/">Early-demographic dividend vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per unit of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 6,581 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.