Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) in Eswatini
Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) was 47.65 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) in Eswatini, 1966–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in Eswatini stood at 47.65 % change on previous year.
The figure is up 198.9% on the previous year and up 581.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in Eswatini peaked at 314.29 % change on previous year in 2011 and was at its lowest, -93.17 % change on previous year, in 2018.
Eswatini ranks 45th of 153 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1966 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1967 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1970 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1971 | -50 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | 200 % change on previous year | -500.0% |
| 1973 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1974 | -33.33 % change on previous year | — |
| 1975 | 50 % change on previous year | -250.0% |
| 1976 | 66.67 % change on previous year | +33.3% |
| 1977 | -20 % change on previous year | -130.0% |
| 1978 | 50 % change on previous year | -350.0% |
| 1979 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1980 | 116.67 % change on previous year | — |
| 1981 | -38.46 % change on previous year | -133.0% |
| 1982 | 37.5 % change on previous year | -197.5% |
| 1983 | 18.18 % change on previous year | -51.5% |
| 1984 | 130.77 % change on previous year | +619.2% |
| 1985 | 6.67 % change on previous year | -94.9% |
| 1986 | -50 % change on previous year | -850.0% |
| 1987 | 281.25 % change on previous year | -662.5% |
| 1988 | -49.18 % change on previous year | -117.5% |
| 1989 | 125.81 % change on previous year | -355.8% |
| 1990 | 18.57 % change on previous year | -85.2% |
| 1991 | 15.66 % change on previous year | -15.7% |
| 1992 | -63.54 % change on previous year | -505.7% |
| 1993 | 65.71 % change on previous year | -203.4% |
| 1994 | -1.72 % change on previous year | -102.6% |
| 1995 | -10.53 % change on previous year | +510.5% |
| 1996 | -31.37 % change on previous year | +198.0% |
| 1997 | -37.14 % change on previous year | +18.4% |
| 1998 | -63.64 % change on previous year | +71.3% |
| 1999 | 37.5 % change on previous year | -158.9% |
| 2000 | -72.73 % change on previous year | -293.9% |
| 2001 | 133.33 % change on previous year | -283.3% |
| 2002 | 57.14 % change on previous year | -57.1% |
| 2003 | -27.27 % change on previous year | -147.7% |
| 2004 | -37.5 % change on previous year | +37.5% |
| 2005 | -80 % change on previous year | +113.3% |
| 2007 | 102.86 % change on previous year | -228.6% |
| 2008 | -64.79 % change on previous year | -163.0% |
| 2009 | 64 % change on previous year | -198.8% |
| 2010 | -14.63 % change on previous year | -122.9% |
| 2011 | 314.29 % change on previous year | -2247.6% |
| 2012 | -1.38 % change on previous year | -100.4% |
| 2013 | 6.99 % change on previous year | -607.0% |
| 2014 | -33.33 % change on previous year | -576.7% |
| 2015 | -21.61 % change on previous year | -35.2% |
| 2016 | -38.56 % change on previous year | +78.5% |
| 2018 | -93.17 % change on previous year | +141.6% |
| 2019 | 19.2 % change on previous year | -120.6% |
| 2020 | -33.28 % change on previous year | -273.3% |
| 2021 | -62.38 % change on previous year | +87.4% |
| 2022 | -48.2 % change on previous year | -22.7% |
| 2023 | 47.65 % change on previous year | -198.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 2 |
| 1970s | 26.33 % change on previous year | -50 % change on previous year | 200 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 57.92 % change on previous year | -50 % change on previous year | 281.25 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -7.05 % change on previous year | -63.64 % change on previous year | 65.71 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 8.34 % change on previous year | -80 % change on previous year | 133.33 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 2010s | 15.31 % change on previous year | -93.17 % change on previous year | 314.29 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 2020s | -24.05 % change on previous year | -62.38 % change on previous year | 47.65 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
- 42 North Korea 63.34 % change on previous year compare
- 43 Kenya 59.29 % change on previous year compare
- 44 Myanmar 52.5 % change on previous year compare
- 46 Peru 47.54 % change on previous year compare
- 47 Tonga 44.1 % change on previous year compare
- 48 Uruguay 44.07 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Eswatini
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 24,761 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1,889 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 585,648 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 13.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 912,632 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 178,216 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 7.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 165,318 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -567,147 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -415,180 current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in Eswatini?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in Eswatini was 47.65 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 314.29 % change on previous year in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was -93.17 % change on previous year in 2018.
- How does Eswatini rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
- Eswatini ranks 45th out of 153 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is up 581.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.