Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) in OECD members
OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) was -28 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) in OECD members, 1971–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
OECD members recorded -28 % change on previous year for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in 2022.
The figure is up 70.6% on the previous year and down 112.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in OECD members peaked at 671.64 % change on previous year in 2020 and was at its lowest, -95.16 % change on previous year, in 2021.
OECD members ranks 33rd of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) in OECD members, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 43.48 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | 145.46 % change on previous year | +234.5% |
| 1973 | -28.4 % change on previous year | -119.5% |
| 1974 | -1.72 % change on previous year | -93.9% |
| 1975 | 29.82 % change on previous year | -1829.8% |
| 1976 | 16.22 % change on previous year | -45.6% |
| 1977 | -13.95 % change on previous year | -186.0% |
| 1978 | -24.32 % change on previous year | +74.3% |
| 1979 | -44.64 % change on previous year | +83.5% |
| 1980 | -16.13 % change on previous year | -63.9% |
| 1981 | -15.38 % change on previous year | -4.6% |
| 1982 | 13.64 % change on previous year | -188.6% |
| 1983 | 56 % change on previous year | +310.7% |
| 1984 | 61.54 % change on previous year | +9.9% |
| 1985 | 188.89 % change on previous year | +206.9% |
| 1986 | 5.49 % change on previous year | -97.1% |
| 1987 | -54.69 % change on previous year | -1095.3% |
| 1988 | 13.79 % change on previous year | -125.2% |
| 1989 | -3.03 % change on previous year | -122.0% |
| 1990 | -17.71 % change on previous year | +484.4% |
| 1991 | 67.09 % change on previous year | -478.9% |
| 1992 | 27.27 % change on previous year | -59.3% |
| 1993 | -30.36 % change on previous year | -211.3% |
| 1994 | -65.81 % change on previous year | +116.8% |
| 1995 | 210 % change on previous year | -419.1% |
| 1996 | 70.97 % change on previous year | -66.2% |
| 1997 | -87.74 % change on previous year | -223.6% |
| 1998 | -3.85 % change on previous year | -95.6% |
| 2000 | -93.12 % change on previous year | +2321.0% |
| 2001 | 147.37 % change on previous year | -258.3% |
| 2002 | -8.51 % change on previous year | -105.8% |
| 2003 | 127.91 % change on previous year | -1602.9% |
| 2004 | 45.92 % change on previous year | -64.1% |
| 2005 | -25.87 % change on previous year | -156.3% |
| 2006 | -57.55 % change on previous year | +122.4% |
| 2007 | 35.56 % change on previous year | -161.8% |
| 2008 | 13.11 % change on previous year | -63.1% |
| 2009 | -39.13 % change on previous year | -398.4% |
| 2011 | -54.34 % change on previous year | +38.9% |
| 2012 | 233.12 % change on previous year | -529.0% |
| 2013 | -52.76 % change on previous year | -122.6% |
| 2014 | -22.71 % change on previous year | -57.0% |
| 2015 | -12.67 % change on previous year | -44.2% |
| 2016 | -60.8 % change on previous year | +380.0% |
| 2017 | 98.43 % change on previous year | -261.9% |
| 2018 | -77.78 % change on previous year | -179.0% |
| 2019 | 19.64 % change on previous year | -125.3% |
| 2020 | 671.64 % change on previous year | +3319.3% |
| 2021 | -95.16 % change on previous year | -114.2% |
| 2022 | -28 % change on previous year | -70.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 13.55 % change on previous year | -44.64 % change on previous year | 145.46 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1980s | 25.01 % change on previous year | -54.69 % change on previous year | 188.89 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 18.87 % change on previous year | -87.74 % change on previous year | 210 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 2000s | 14.57 % change on previous year | -93.12 % change on previous year | 147.37 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 7.79 % change on previous year | -77.78 % change on previous year | 233.12 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 2020s | 182.83 % change on previous year | -95.16 % change on previous year | 671.64 % change on previous year | 3 |
Countries ranked near OECD members
- 30 Tanzania, United Republic of 100.69 % change on previous year compare
- 31 Brunei Darussalam 100 % change on previous year compare
- 31 Republic of Korea 100 % change on previous year compare
- 33 Guinea 92.08 % change on previous year compare
- 34 Djibouti 92.06 % change on previous year compare
- 35 Belize 83.18 % change on previous year compare
- 36 Fiji 82.38 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for OECD members
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 31.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 14.83 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 75.99 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.64 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 39.41 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 387.66 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 673.54 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 108.61 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 45.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 477.76 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in OECD members?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in OECD members was -28 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) recorded in OECD members?
- The highest recorded value was 671.64 % change on previous year in 2020.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) recorded in OECD members?
- The lowest recorded value was -95.16 % change on previous year in 2021.
- How does OECD members rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
- OECD members ranks 33rd out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) rising or falling in OECD members?
- Over the last ten years it is down 112.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this OECD members data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 50 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.