Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) in East Asia & Pacific

East Asia & Pacific: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) was 1.92 billion current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
1.92 billion current US$
Change on year
up 11.0%
Rank
3rd
of 46 groups
All-time high
2.49 billion current US$
in 2012
All-time low
92.81 million current US$
in 1965
Years of data
59
1965–2023

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) in East Asia & Pacific, 1965–2023

0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B196519942023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

East Asia & Pacific recorded 1.92 billion current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in 2023.

The figure is up 11.0% on the previous year and down 13.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in East Asia & Pacific peaked at 2.49 billion current US$ in 2012 and was at its lowest, 92.81 million current US$, in 1965.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 3rd of 46 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) in East Asia & Pacific, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled in East Asia & Pacific, 1965 to 2023.
Year current US$ Change
1965 92.81 million current US$
1966 97.61 million current US$ +5.2%
1967 114.86 million current US$ +17.7%
1968 134.52 million current US$ +17.1%
1969 145.63 million current US$ +8.3%
1970 179.97 million current US$ +23.6%
1971 176.07 million current US$ -2.2%
1972 235.61 million current US$ +33.8%
1973 246.44 million current US$ +4.6%
1974 328.82 million current US$ +33.4%
1975 373.74 million current US$ +13.7%
1976 288.98 million current US$ -22.7%
1977 313.06 million current US$ +8.3%
1978 370.42 million current US$ +18.3%
1979 380.78 million current US$ +2.8%
1980 412.93 million current US$ +8.4%
1981 415.94 million current US$ +0.7%
1982 423.82 million current US$ +1.9%
1983 408.82 million current US$ -3.5%
1984 473.25 million current US$ +15.8%
1985 449.14 million current US$ -5.1%
1986 428.36 million current US$ -4.6%
1987 442.13 million current US$ +3.2%
1988 524.26 million current US$ +18.6%
1989 535.38 million current US$ +2.1%
1990 563.13 million current US$ +5.2%
1991 570.85 million current US$ +1.4%
1992 566.94 million current US$ -0.7%
1993 560.40 million current US$ -1.2%
1994 641.93 million current US$ +14.5%
1995 704.07 million current US$ +9.7%
1996 642.75 million current US$ -8.7%
1997 593.61 million current US$ -7.6%
1998 580.19 million current US$ -2.3%
1999 532.67 million current US$ -8.2%
2000 591.10 million current US$ +11.0%
2001 489.77 million current US$ -17.1%
2002 521.64 million current US$ +6.5%
2003 654.06 million current US$ +25.4%
2004 781.63 million current US$ +19.5%
2005 921.85 million current US$ +17.9%
2006 1.06 billion current US$ +15.2%
2007 1.34 billion current US$ +26.5%
2008 1.46 billion current US$ +8.8%
2009 1.43 billion current US$ -2.1%
2010 1.88 billion current US$ +31.2%
2011 2.28 billion current US$ +21.3%
2012 2.49 billion current US$ +9.5%
2013 2.23 billion current US$ -10.4%
2014 1.92 billion current US$ -14.0%
2015 1.67 billion current US$ -13.2%
2016 1.30 billion current US$ -21.7%
2017 1.36 billion current US$ +4.6%
2018 1.41 billion current US$ +3.7%
2019 1.31 billion current US$ -7.7%
2020 1.28 billion current US$ -1.7%
2021 2.16 billion current US$ +68.2%
2022 1.73 billion current US$ -19.7%
2023 1.92 billion current US$ +11.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 117.09 million current US$ 92.81 million current US$ 145.63 million current US$ 5
1970s 289.39 million current US$ 176.07 million current US$ 380.78 million current US$ 10
1980s 451.40 million current US$ 408.82 million current US$ 535.38 million current US$ 10
1990s 595.65 million current US$ 532.67 million current US$ 704.07 million current US$ 10
2000s 925.97 million current US$ 489.77 million current US$ 1.46 billion current US$ 10
2010s 1.79 billion current US$ 1.30 billion current US$ 2.49 billion current US$ 10
2020s 1.78 billion current US$ 1.28 billion current US$ 2.16 billion current US$ 4

Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific

  1. 1 Papua New Guinea 423.23 million current US$ compare
  2. 2 Indonesia 218.02 million current US$ compare
  3. 3 Solomon Islands 107.45 million current US$ compare
  4. 4 Fiji 104.76 million current US$ compare
  5. 5 Myanmar 100.92 million current US$ compare
  6. 6 Timor-Leste 94.00 million current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 210 places →

More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific

All data for East Asia & Pacific →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in East Asia & Pacific?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in East Asia & Pacific was 1.92 billion current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
The highest recorded value was 2.49 billion current US$ in 2012.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
The lowest recorded value was 92.81 million current US$ in 1965.
How does East Asia & Pacific rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 3rd out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific?
Over the last ten years it is down 13.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this East Asia & Pacific data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) in East Asia & Pacific. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/east-asia-and-pacific/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/east-asia-and-pacific/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) in East Asia & Pacific</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 7,729 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.