Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) was 98.09 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) recorded 98.09 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in 2022.
The figure is up 21.4% on the previous year and down 75.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) peaked at 392.42 million current US$ in 2012 and was at its lowest, 870,000 current US$, in 1972.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 24th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 890,000 current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 890,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 870,000 current US$ | -2.2% |
| 1973 | 1.48 million current US$ | +70.1% |
| 1974 | 3.31 million current US$ | +123.6% |
| 1975 | 5.84 million current US$ | +76.4% |
| 1976 | 2.35 million current US$ | -59.8% |
| 1977 | 6.47 million current US$ | +175.3% |
| 1978 | 8.63 million current US$ | +33.4% |
| 1979 | 7.79 million current US$ | -9.7% |
| 1980 | 11.80 million current US$ | +51.5% |
| 1981 | 24.40 million current US$ | +106.8% |
| 1982 | 39.94 million current US$ | +63.7% |
| 1983 | 34.31 million current US$ | -14.1% |
| 1984 | 32.71 million current US$ | -4.7% |
| 1985 | 20.55 million current US$ | -37.2% |
| 1986 | 17.17 million current US$ | -16.4% |
| 1987 | 24.63 million current US$ | +43.4% |
| 1988 | 27.49 million current US$ | +11.6% |
| 1989 | 37.93 million current US$ | +38.0% |
| 1990 | 39.63 million current US$ | +4.5% |
| 1991 | 33.25 million current US$ | -16.1% |
| 1992 | 36.14 million current US$ | +8.7% |
| 1993 | 29.79 million current US$ | -17.6% |
| 1994 | 47.01 million current US$ | +57.8% |
| 1995 | 37.93 million current US$ | -19.3% |
| 1996 | 38.07 million current US$ | +0.4% |
| 1997 | 29.96 million current US$ | -21.3% |
| 1998 | 22.71 million current US$ | -24.2% |
| 1999 | 18.10 million current US$ | -20.3% |
| 2000 | 22.03 million current US$ | +21.7% |
| 2001 | 17.60 million current US$ | -20.1% |
| 2002 | 25.87 million current US$ | +47.0% |
| 2003 | 21.11 million current US$ | -18.4% |
| 2004 | 44.03 million current US$ | +108.6% |
| 2005 | 38.27 million current US$ | -13.1% |
| 2006 | 45.52 million current US$ | +18.9% |
| 2007 | 92.11 million current US$ | +102.4% |
| 2008 | 164.86 million current US$ | +79.0% |
| 2009 | 134.36 million current US$ | -18.5% |
| 2010 | 184.41 million current US$ | +37.3% |
| 2011 | 360.61 million current US$ | +95.5% |
| 2012 | 392.42 million current US$ | +8.8% |
| 2013 | 250.69 million current US$ | -36.1% |
| 2014 | 217.66 million current US$ | -13.2% |
| 2015 | 135.98 million current US$ | -37.5% |
| 2016 | 107.80 million current US$ | -20.7% |
| 2017 | 136.88 million current US$ | +27.0% |
| 2018 | 114.27 million current US$ | -16.5% |
| 2019 | 96.73 million current US$ | -15.3% |
| 2020 | 60.40 million current US$ | -37.6% |
| 2021 | 80.80 million current US$ | +33.8% |
| 2022 | 98.09 million current US$ | +21.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 3.85 million current US$ | 870,000 current US$ | 8.63 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 27.09 million current US$ | 11.80 million current US$ | 39.94 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 33.26 million current US$ | 18.10 million current US$ | 47.01 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 60.58 million current US$ | 17.60 million current US$ | 164.86 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 199.75 million current US$ | 96.73 million current US$ | 392.42 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 79.76 million current US$ | 60.40 million current US$ | 98.09 million current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- 21 Nepal 18.36 million current US$ compare
- 22 Thailand 14.36 million current US$ compare
- 23 Kenya 11.23 million current US$ compare
- 24 Lebanon 11.01 million current US$ compare
- 25 Pakistan 10.88 million current US$ compare
- 26 Ethiopia 10.65 million current US$ compare
- 27 Syria 9.40 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 61.63 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 413.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.20 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.27 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 534.00 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.57 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.55 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.14 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 362.50 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.27 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) was 98.09 million current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The highest recorded value was 392.42 million current US$ in 2012.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The lowest recorded value was 870,000 current US$ in 1972.
- How does Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 24th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) rising or falling in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 75.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.