Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific
East Asia & Pacific: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per was 78.71 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
78.71 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 11.0%
Rank
7th
of 46 groups
All-time high
101.95 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2012
All-time low
3.8 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1965
Years of data
59
1965–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
East Asia & Pacific recorded 78.71 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 11.0% on the previous year and down 13.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific peaked at 101.95 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012 and was at its lowest, 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1965.
That places East Asia & Pacific 7th out of 46 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 4 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1967 | 4.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.7% |
| 1968 | 5.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 1969 | 5.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1970 | 7.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.6% |
| 1971 | 7.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1972 | 9.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.8% |
| 1973 | 10.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1974 | 13.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.4% |
| 1975 | 15.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 1976 | 11.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.7% |
| 1977 | 12.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1978 | 15.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.3% |
| 1979 | 15.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1980 | 16.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 1981 | 17.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1982 | 17.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1983 | 16.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1984 | 19.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 1985 | 18.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 1986 | 17.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 1987 | 18.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1988 | 21.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 1989 | 21.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1990 | 23.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1991 | 23.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1992 | 23.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1993 | 22.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1994 | 26.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 1995 | 28.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1996 | 26.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 1997 | 24.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 1998 | 23.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1999 | 21.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 2000 | 24.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 2001 | 20.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 2002 | 21.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2003 | 26.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.4% |
| 2004 | 31.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 2005 | 37.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 2006 | 43.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.2% |
| 2007 | 54.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.5% |
| 2008 | 59.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 2009 | 58.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2010 | 76.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.2% |
| 2011 | 93.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.3% |
| 2012 | 101.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 2013 | 91.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 2014 | 78.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 2015 | 68.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 2016 | 53.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.8% |
| 2017 | 55.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2018 | 57.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2019 | 53.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 2020 | 52.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2021 | 88.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.1% |
| 2022 | 70.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.6% |
| 2023 | 78.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 11.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 18.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 24.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 37.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 20.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 59.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 73.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 53.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 101.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 72.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 52.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 88.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific
- 4 Kiribati 34,906 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Samoa 15,677 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Palau 15,625 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Marshall Islands 11,913 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Micronesia (country) 7,707 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Maldives 6,838 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 East Timor 6,322 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 34.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 13.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 613.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 130.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 604.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 550.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 5.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.61 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific was 78.71 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The highest recorded value was 101.95 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does East Asia & Pacific rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 7th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific?
- Over the last ten years it is down 13.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.