Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia … Australia square in Korea
Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia … Australia square was 0.5183 current US$ per square kilometre in 1998. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Korea, 1965–1998
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 1998, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Korea stood at 0.5183 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the lowest value across all 32 years on record.
The figure is down 58.3% on the previous year and down 92.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Korea peaked at 9.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 1969 and was at its lowest, 0.5183 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1998.
Korea ranks 104th of 160 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia … Australia square in Korea, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 2.8 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 2.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.0% |
| 1968 | 7.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +335.3% |
| 1969 | 9.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 1970 | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.9% |
| 1971 | 3.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.1% |
| 1972 | 8.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +150.0% |
| 1973 | 6.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.5% |
| 1974 | 5.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 1975 | 7.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 1976 | 7.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1977 | 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.6% |
| 1978 | 5.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1979 | 3.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.2% |
| 1980 | 2.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 1981 | 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.0% |
| 1982 | 2.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1983 | 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1984 | 5.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +168.4% |
| 1985 | 8.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.8% |
| 1986 | 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.7% |
| 1987 | 6.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1988 | 7.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1989 | 4.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.2% |
| 1990 | 6.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.8% |
| 1991 | 4.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 1992 | 2.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.2% |
| 1993 | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.7% |
| 1994 | 0.622 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.5% |
| 1995 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1998 | 0.5183 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.3% |
Korea compared with similar countries
- Korea's 0.5183 current US$ per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre, 37% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
- Korea's 0.5183 current US$ per square kilometre is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 214.04 current US$ per square kilometre, 0% of the median. (30 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia … Australia square in Korea changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1968 | +335.3% | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.67 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 5.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5183 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
Countries ranked near Korea
- 101 Nicaragua 0.5467 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 102 Equatorial Guinea 0.5319 current US$ per square kilometre
- 103 Poland 0.5224 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 105 Djibouti 0.4937 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 106 Libya 0.3776 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 107 Serbia 0.3435 current US$ per square kilometre
More aid effectiveness data for Korea
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 1.74 million current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 770,000 current US$ (1998)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 10,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 50,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 25.76 million current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 9.74 million current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 240,000 current US$ (1995)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.65 million current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -49.52 million current US$ (1999)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Korea?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Korea was 0.5183 current US$ per square kilometre in 1998, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Korea?
- The highest recorded value was 9.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 1969.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Korea?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5183 current US$ per square kilometre in 1998.
- How does Korea rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- Korea ranks 104th out of 160 countries with data for 1998.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per rising or falling in Korea?
- Over the last ten years it is down 92.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Korea data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.