Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia … Australia square in Laos
Laos: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia … Australia square was 156.81 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Laos, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Laos is 156.81 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.7% on the previous year and down 26.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Laos peaked at 233.67 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.6066 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1980.
Laos ranks 26th of 160 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia … Australia square in Laos, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 3.25 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 5.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.0% |
| 1967 | 4.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 1968 | 6.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.5% |
| 1969 | 5.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.7% |
| 1970 | 5.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1971 | 6.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 1972 | 5.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1973 | 7.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.1% |
| 1974 | 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.4% |
| 1975 | 21.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +104.9% |
| 1976 | 8.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.7% |
| 1977 | 5.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.6% |
| 1978 | 6.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.4% |
| 1979 | 9.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.7% |
| 1980 | 0.6066 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.8% |
| 1981 | 4.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +571.4% |
| 1982 | 7.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.6% |
| 1983 | 7.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1984 | 11.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.6% |
| 1985 | 11.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1986 | 15.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.3% |
| 1987 | 18.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.0% |
| 1988 | 18.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1989 | 29.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.1% |
| 1990 | 25.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 1991 | 32.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 1992 | 45.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.4% |
| 1993 | 45.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1994 | 46.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1995 | 56.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 1996 | 53.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1997 | 61.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 1998 | 45.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.9% |
| 1999 | 37.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.7% |
| 2000 | 51.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.8% |
| 2001 | 49.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2002 | 37.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.6% |
| 2003 | 43.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 2004 | 56.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.7% |
| 2005 | 45.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 2006 | 55.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.5% |
| 2007 | 88.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.2% |
| 2008 | 121.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.2% |
| 2009 | 128.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2010 | 141.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 2011 | 233.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.0% |
| 2012 | 233.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2013 | 213.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 2014 | 228.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 2015 | 157.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.1% |
| 2016 | 126.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.8% |
| 2017 | 102.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.8% |
| 2018 | 114.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2019 | 107.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 2020 | 73 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.8% |
| 2021 | 177.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +143.4% |
| 2022 | 157.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 2023 | 156.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
Laos compared with similar countries
- Laos's 156.81 current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre, 52.5× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Laos's 156.81 current US$ per square kilometre is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 214.04 current US$ per square kilometre, 73% of the median. (30 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia … Australia square in Laos changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1981 | +571.4% | 0.6066 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.07 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 8.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 12.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6066 current US$ per square kilometre | 29.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 45.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 61.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 67.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 37.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 128.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 165.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 102.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 233.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 141.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 73 current US$ per square kilometre | 177.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Laos
- 23 Vietnam 214.79 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Philippines 213.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Mauritius 167.03 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Myanmar 154.63 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Antigua and Barbuda 137.66 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Nepal 128.07 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Laos
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 633,383 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 42,326 current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 569,498 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 56.64 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 17.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 26.81 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 15.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 135,203 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 119,973 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 41.74 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Laos?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Laos was 156.81 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Laos?
- The highest recorded value was 233.67 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Laos?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.6066 current US$ per square kilometre in 1980.
- How does Laos rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- Laos ranks 26th out of 160 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per rising or falling in Laos?
- Over the last ten years it is down 26.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Laos data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.