Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per was 11.31 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
11.31 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 14.8%
Rank
19th
of 46 groups
All-time high
20.29 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2012
All-time low
0.1566 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1965
Years of data
59
1965–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Upper middle income, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Upper middle income stood at 11.31 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is up 14.8% on the previous year and down 33.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Upper middle income peaked at 20.29 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0.1566 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1965.
Upper middle income ranks 19th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 0.1566 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0.1706 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 1967 | 0.2697 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.1% |
| 1968 | 0.3941 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.1% |
| 1969 | 0.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.9% |
| 1970 | 0.6651 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.0% |
| 1971 | 0.6893 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1972 | 0.8424 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 1973 | 0.964 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 1974 | 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.5% |
| 1975 | 1.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 1976 | 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 1977 | 1.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 1978 | 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.9% |
| 1979 | 2.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 1980 | 2.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1981 | 2.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1982 | 2.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 1983 | 2.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1984 | 3.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.1% |
| 1985 | 3.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 1986 | 3.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 1987 | 3.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1988 | 4.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.6% |
| 1989 | 5.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1990 | 5.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1991 | 5.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1992 | 4.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1993 | 5.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1994 | 5.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 1995 | 5.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1996 | 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.2% |
| 1997 | 4.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 1998 | 3.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.2% |
| 1999 | 4.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.3% |
| 2000 | 3.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 2001 | 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.6% |
| 2002 | 3.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2003 | 4.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.1% |
| 2004 | 5.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 2005 | 6.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.7% |
| 2006 | 13.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +98.4% |
| 2007 | 16.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 2008 | 15.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2009 | 11.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.2% |
| 2010 | 13.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 2011 | 16.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.5% |
| 2012 | 20.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.9% |
| 2013 | 17.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 2014 | 13.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.8% |
| 2015 | 11.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 2016 | 9.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.0% |
| 2017 | 8.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2018 | 9.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2019 | 7.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.0% |
| 2020 | 7.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 2021 | 14.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.3% |
| 2022 | 9.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.1% |
| 2023 | 11.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2982 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1566 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6651 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 8.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 12.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 20.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 10.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 16 Lebanon 1,076 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Saint Kitts and Nevis 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Papua New Guinea 934.58 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Bangladesh 654.45 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Barbados 558.14 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 21 Cambodia 333.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Sri Lanka 330.96 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Upper middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 264.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 114.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.36 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 24.06 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 518.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.80 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 607.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 175.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.85 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Upper middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Upper middle income was 11.31 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 20.29 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1566 current US$ per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does Upper middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- Upper middle income ranks 19th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 33.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.