Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per was 0.2204 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Uzbekistan, 1994–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Uzbekistan is 0.2204 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2022.
That represents a change of up 403.2% on the previous year and up 140.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Uzbekistan peaked at 0.3526 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1996.
That places Uzbekistan 116th out of 160 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1994 | 0.0235 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1996 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1997 | 0.3526 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2000 | 0.0688 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.5% |
| 2001 | 0.0459 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 2002 | 0.0688 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 2013 | 0.0918 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.4% |
| 2018 | 0.0563 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.7% |
| 2021 | 0.0438 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.2% |
| 2022 | 0.2204 current US$ per square kilometre | +403.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1254 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3526 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
| 2000s | 0.0612 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0459 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0688 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
| 2010s | 0.074 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0563 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0918 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
| 2020s | 0.1321 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0438 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2204 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
- 113 Azerbaijan 0.2303 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 114 Costa Rica 0.2282 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 115 Madagascar 0.2232 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 117 Honduras 0.2079 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 118 Botswana 0.2066 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 119 Egypt 0.2048 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Uzbekistan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 5,038 current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 82,995 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 18.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 11.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 25.30 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 98.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 887,887 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 238.66 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Uzbekistan?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Uzbekistan was 0.2204 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.3526 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- Uzbekistan ranks 116th out of 160 countries with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 140.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.