Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps in India
India: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps was 12.92 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps in India, 1963–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
India recorded 12.92 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps in 2023. That is the highest value across all 61 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 7.3% on the previous year and up 409.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps in India peaked at 12.92 million current US$ in 2023 and was at its lowest, -30.04 million current US$, in 2003.
India ranks 10th of 154 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps in India, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1963 | -310,000 current US$ | — |
| 1964 | 3.77 million current US$ | -1316.1% |
| 1965 | 4.26 million current US$ | +13.0% |
| 1966 | 4.53 million current US$ | +6.3% |
| 1967 | 4.65 million current US$ | +2.6% |
| 1968 | 3.74 million current US$ | -19.6% |
| 1969 | 2.31 million current US$ | -38.2% |
| 1970 | 1.23 million current US$ | -46.8% |
| 1971 | 110,000 current US$ | -91.1% |
| 1972 | -1.09 million current US$ | -1090.9% |
| 1973 | 610,000 current US$ | -156.0% |
| 1974 | 1.50 million current US$ | +145.9% |
| 1975 | 3.93 million current US$ | +162.0% |
| 1976 | 3.01 million current US$ | -23.4% |
| 1977 | 2.92 million current US$ | -3.0% |
| 1978 | 230,000 current US$ | -92.1% |
| 1979 | 290,000 current US$ | +26.1% |
| 1980 | 12.30 million current US$ | +4141.4% |
| 1981 | 5.93 million current US$ | -51.8% |
| 1982 | 200,000 current US$ | -96.6% |
| 1983 | 5.26 million current US$ | +2530.0% |
| 1984 | -1.03 million current US$ | -119.6% |
| 1985 | -810,000 current US$ | -21.4% |
| 1986 | 5.06 million current US$ | -724.7% |
| 1987 | -1.44 million current US$ | -128.5% |
| 1988 | -1.33 million current US$ | -7.6% |
| 1989 | 8.03 million current US$ | -703.8% |
| 1990 | -1.64 million current US$ | -120.4% |
| 1991 | 9.12 million current US$ | -656.1% |
| 1992 | -1.59 million current US$ | -117.4% |
| 1993 | -2.20 million current US$ | +38.4% |
| 1994 | -4.45 million current US$ | +102.3% |
| 1995 | -990,000 current US$ | -77.8% |
| 1996 | -2.89 million current US$ | +191.9% |
| 1997 | -470,000 current US$ | -83.7% |
| 1998 | -1.53 million current US$ | +225.5% |
| 1999 | -2.36 million current US$ | +54.2% |
| 2000 | 750,000 current US$ | -131.8% |
| 2001 | -340,000 current US$ | -145.3% |
| 2002 | 570,000 current US$ | -267.6% |
| 2003 | -30.04 million current US$ | -5370.2% |
| 2004 | 2.42 million current US$ | -108.1% |
| 2005 | 8.01 million current US$ | +231.0% |
| 2006 | 1.72 million current US$ | -78.5% |
| 2007 | 2.56 million current US$ | +48.8% |
| 2008 | 2.44 million current US$ | -4.7% |
| 2009 | 2.34 million current US$ | -4.1% |
| 2010 | 2.15 million current US$ | -8.1% |
| 2011 | 1.99 million current US$ | -7.4% |
| 2012 | 2.32 million current US$ | +16.5% |
| 2013 | 2.54 million current US$ | +9.5% |
| 2014 | 2.71 million current US$ | +6.8% |
| 2015 | 3.39 million current US$ | +24.8% |
| 2016 | 3.67 million current US$ | +8.4% |
| 2017 | 4.01 million current US$ | +9.1% |
| 2018 | 5.14 million current US$ | +28.2% |
| 2019 | 4.59 million current US$ | -10.7% |
| 2020 | 9.75 million current US$ | +112.5% |
| 2021 | 11.67 million current US$ | +19.7% |
| 2022 | 12.05 million current US$ | +3.2% |
| 2023 | 12.92 million current US$ | +7.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.28 million current US$ | -310,000 current US$ | 4.65 million current US$ | 7 |
| 1970s | 1.27 million current US$ | -1.09 million current US$ | 3.93 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.22 million current US$ | -1.44 million current US$ | 12.30 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | -900,000 current US$ | -4.45 million current US$ | 9.12 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | -957,000 current US$ | -30.04 million current US$ | 8.01 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.25 million current US$ | 1.99 million current US$ | 5.14 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 11.60 million current US$ | 9.75 million current US$ | 12.92 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near India
- 7 Syrian Arab Republic 15.76 million current US$ compare
- 8 Iran, Islamic Republic of 15.14 million current US$ compare
- 9 Albania 13.06 million current US$ compare
- 11 Mozambique 12.66 million current US$ compare
- 12 Indonesia 10.89 million current US$ compare
- 13 Serbia 10.83 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for India
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 12.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 851,674 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 63.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 90.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 7.85 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 434.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 106.71 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 31.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 21.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 2.89 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps in India?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps in India was 12.92 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps recorded in India?
- The highest recorded value was 12.92 million current US$ in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps recorded in India?
- The lowest recorded value was -30.04 million current US$ in 2003.
- How does India rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps?
- India ranks 10th out of 154 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps rising or falling in India?
- Over the last ten years it is up 409.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this India data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 61 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) with 389 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) with 389 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.