Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per was 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
2.14 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 34.4%
Rank
34th
of 44 groups
All-time high
8.25 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2014
All-time low
-4.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1992
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) recorded 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is up 34.4% on the previous year and down 50.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) peaked at 8.25 current US$ per square kilometre in 2014 and was at its lowest, -4.14 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1992.
That places East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) 34th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.0333 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0.0075 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.4% |
| 1965 | 0.3234 current US$ per square kilometre | +4191.7% |
| 1966 | 0.0383 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.2% |
| 1967 | -0.103 current US$ per square kilometre | -368.9% |
| 1968 | 0.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -109.8% |
| 1969 | -0.0113 current US$ per square kilometre | -212.5% |
| 1970 | 0.309 current US$ per square kilometre | -2833.3% |
| 1971 | -0.0358 current US$ per square kilometre | -111.6% |
| 1972 | 0.0094 current US$ per square kilometre | -126.3% |
| 1973 | 0.0019 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0251 current US$ per square kilometre | +1233.3% |
| 1975 | 0.017 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.5% |
| 1976 | 0.0967 current US$ per square kilometre | +470.4% |
| 1977 | 0.1388 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.5% |
| 1978 | 0.6224 current US$ per square kilometre | +348.4% |
| 1979 | 0.8705 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.9% |
| 1980 | 4.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +409.9% |
| 1981 | 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.0% |
| 1982 | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.5% |
| 1983 | 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 1984 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.8% |
| 1985 | 0.7599 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.4% |
| 1986 | 0.402 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.1% |
| 1987 | 0.1369 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.9% |
| 1988 | 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +1129.8% |
| 1989 | 3.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +121.6% |
| 1990 | 4.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1991 | 3.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.6% |
| 1992 | -4.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -233.8% |
| 1993 | -2.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.7% |
| 1994 | -2.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1995 | 2.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -183.4% |
| 1996 | 2.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 1997 | 1.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.9% |
| 1998 | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 1999 | 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.6% |
| 2000 | 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.0% |
| 2001 | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2002 | 0.6079 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.6% |
| 2003 | 0.6489 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2004 | 0.8122 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.2% |
| 2005 | 1.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.5% |
| 2006 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2007 | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.2% |
| 2008 | 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.5% |
| 2009 | 1.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.7% |
| 2010 | 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2011 | 2.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.8% |
| 2012 | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 2013 | 4.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +131.0% |
| 2014 | 8.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.6% |
| 2015 | 1.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -79.5% |
| 2016 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.8% |
| 2017 | 1.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.1% |
| 2018 | 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 2019 | 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.6% |
| 2020 | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.4% |
| 2021 | 1.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.9% |
| 2022 | 1.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2023 | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0331 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.103 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3234 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.2055 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0358 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8705 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1369 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.6139 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6079 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- 31 Uganda 38.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Dominica 35.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Israel 34.66 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Malta 31.25 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Nepal 29.99 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 29.56 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Mauritius 24.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 34.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 13.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 613.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 130.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 604.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 550.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 5.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.61 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) was 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 8.25 current US$ per square kilometre in 2014.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was -4.14 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992.
- How does East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 34th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 50.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.