Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per was 33.48 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) recorded 33.48 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is down 13.3% on the previous year and up 29.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) peaked at 53.62 current US$ per square kilometre in 1991 and was at its lowest, -0.2886 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1973.
That places Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) 1st out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 6.06 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.2133 current US$ per square kilometre | -96.5% |
| 1964 | 3.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +1594.1% |
| 1965 | 0.2133 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.1% |
| 1966 | 14.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +6888.2% |
| 1967 | 5.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.3% |
| 1968 | 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.5% |
| 1969 | 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 1970 | 0.2133 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.3% |
| 1971 | -0.1129 current US$ per square kilometre | -152.9% |
| 1972 | 0.7026 current US$ per square kilometre | -722.2% |
| 1973 | -0.2886 current US$ per square kilometre | -141.1% |
| 1974 | 0.0376 current US$ per square kilometre | -113.0% |
| 1975 | 0.1631 current US$ per square kilometre | +333.3% |
| 1976 | 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +1100.0% |
| 1977 | 4.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +154.5% |
| 1978 | 6.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.3% |
| 1979 | 13.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +101.3% |
| 1980 | 36.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +168.4% |
| 1981 | 39.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1982 | 7.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.0% |
| 1983 | 9.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1984 | 6.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.4% |
| 1985 | 8.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.8% |
| 1986 | 10.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.6% |
| 1987 | 12.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.4% |
| 1988 | 28.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +125.1% |
| 1989 | 50.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.2% |
| 1990 | 21.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.3% |
| 1991 | 53.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +146.6% |
| 1992 | 26.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.9% |
| 1993 | 23.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 1994 | 26.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 1995 | 27.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1996 | 23.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 1997 | 13.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.4% |
| 1998 | 14.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1999 | 20.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.5% |
| 2000 | 13.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.1% |
| 2001 | 10.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.7% |
| 2002 | 22.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +102.5% |
| 2003 | 12.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.4% |
| 2004 | 15.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.8% |
| 2005 | 21.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.2% |
| 2006 | 23.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 2007 | 31.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.6% |
| 2008 | 26.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 2009 | 23.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 2010 | 23.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2011 | 21.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 2012 | 22.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2013 | 25.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 2014 | 25.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2015 | 18.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.1% |
| 2016 | 21.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 2017 | 24.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 2018 | 22.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 2019 | 20.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 2020 | 22.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 2021 | 27.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 2022 | 38.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.5% |
| 2023 | 33.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 2.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2886 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 21.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 50.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 25.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 53.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 20.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 22.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 30.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 38.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- 1 Palestine, State of 1,259 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 2 Lebanon 483.93 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 3 Albania 476.46 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 Bosnia and Herzegovina 401.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 197.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 85.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.03 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 23.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 419.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.28 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 636.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 416.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 92.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
All data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) was 33.48 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 53.62 current US$ per square kilometre in 1991.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.2886 current US$ per square kilometre in 1973.
- How does Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 1st out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 29.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.