Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per was 0.2189 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of, 1986–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of is 0.2189 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 86.2% on the previous year and down 14.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of peaked at 13.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2001 and was at its lowest, 0.083 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1993.
That places Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 137th out of 153 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1986 | 0.1661 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1987 | 0.1661 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.1661 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.3322 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1992 | 0.2491 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1993 | 0.083 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 1994 | 0.4152 current US$ per square kilometre | +400.0% |
| 1995 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1996 | 0.8305 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1997 | 0.4983 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1998 | 0.9966 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1999 | 0.3322 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 2000 | 0.4152 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 2001 | 13.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +3060.0% |
| 2002 | 0.9135 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.0% |
| 2003 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.3% |
| 2004 | 4.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +292.9% |
| 2005 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.5% |
| 2006 | 0.4152 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.3% |
| 2007 | 0.083 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.0% |
| 2008 | 0.083 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.083 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.1661 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 2011 | 0.2491 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 2013 | 0.2554 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2015 | 0.2456 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 2016 | 0.5348 current US$ per square kilometre | +117.8% |
| 2017 | 0.3153 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.1% |
| 2018 | 0.4198 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.2% |
| 2019 | 0.4237 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2020 | 0.2304 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.6% |
| 2021 | 0.0997 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.7% |
| 2022 | 0.1176 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 2023 | 0.2189 current US$ per square kilometre | +86.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1661 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1661 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1661 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
| 1990s | 0.5537 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.083 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2000s | 2.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.083 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.3262 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1661 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5348 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2020s | 0.1667 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0997 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2304 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
- 134 Cambodia 0.2679 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 135 Guinea-Bissau 0.2418 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 136 Benin 0.2375 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 138 Zimbabwe 0.196 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 139 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 0.1825 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 140 Gabon 0.1687 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 26,363 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 999 current US$ (2015)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.27 million current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 452,292 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 556,002 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 199,133 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 803,033 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 185,326 current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 21,444 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway 416,108 current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of was 0.2189 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per recorded in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of?
- The highest recorded value was 13.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2001.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per recorded in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.083 current US$ per square kilometre in 1993.
- How does Korea, Democratic People's Republic of rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
- Korea, Democratic People's Republic of ranks 137th out of 153 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per rising or falling in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of?
- Over the last ten years it is down 14.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Korea, Democratic People's Republic of data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.