Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per was 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) stood at 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 2.9% on the previous year and up 2.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) peaked at 4.26 current US$ per square kilometre in 2001 and was at its lowest, -0.0303 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1971.
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 39th of 44 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0005 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.0048 current US$ per square kilometre | +800.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0383 current US$ per square kilometre | +700.0% |
| 1965 | 0.3398 current US$ per square kilometre | +787.5% |
| 1966 | 0.1707 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.8% |
| 1967 | 0.1329 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.1% |
| 1968 | 0.008 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.0% |
| 1969 | -0.0181 current US$ per square kilometre | -326.7% |
| 1970 | 0.0011 current US$ per square kilometre | -105.9% |
| 1971 | -0.0303 current US$ per square kilometre | -2950.0% |
| 1972 | 0.009 current US$ per square kilometre | -129.8% |
| 1973 | 0.0213 current US$ per square kilometre | +135.3% |
| 1974 | 0.3839 current US$ per square kilometre | +1705.0% |
| 1975 | 0.0457 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.1% |
| 1976 | 0.1388 current US$ per square kilometre | +203.5% |
| 1977 | 0.1914 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.9% |
| 1978 | 0.2084 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 1979 | 0.2935 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.8% |
| 1980 | 0.4211 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.5% |
| 1981 | 0.2855 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.2% |
| 1982 | 0.7332 current US$ per square kilometre | +156.8% |
| 1983 | 0.5849 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.2% |
| 1984 | 0.3095 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.1% |
| 1985 | 0.3775 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 1986 | 0.2903 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.1% |
| 1987 | 0.3004 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1988 | 0.3573 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 1989 | 0.4982 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.4% |
| 1990 | 0.6705 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.6% |
| 1991 | 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +109.6% |
| 1992 | 0.7008 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.1% |
| 1993 | 1.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +131.4% |
| 1994 | 1.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1995 | 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1996 | 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1997 | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.6% |
| 1998 | 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.6% |
| 1999 | 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2000 | 0.9761 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 2001 | 4.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +336.4% |
| 2002 | 0.8143 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.9% |
| 2003 | 0.9405 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 2004 | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 2005 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2006 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2007 | 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 2008 | 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2009 | 1.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2010 | 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.7% |
| 2011 | 1.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.5% |
| 2012 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 2013 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2014 | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2015 | 0.8822 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.4% |
| 2016 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.5% |
| 2017 | 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2018 | 1.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 2019 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.2% |
| 2020 | 1.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.9% |
| 2021 | 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.9% |
| 2022 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2023 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0752 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0181 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3398 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.1263 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0303 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3839 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.4158 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2855 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7332 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6705 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8143 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8822 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- 36 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 29.56 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Mauritius 24.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Barbados 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 El Salvador 22.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Bangladesh 21.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Antigua and Barbuda 20.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Republic of Korea 18.04 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 23.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 364.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 739.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 164.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 670.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 874.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 195.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 665.35 million current US$ (2023)
All data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) was 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 4.26 current US$ per square kilometre in 2001.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0303 current US$ per square kilometre in 1971.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
- Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 39th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.