Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Low & middle income
Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per was 11.3 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Low & middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Low & middle income is 11.3 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 16.5% on the previous year and up 65.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Low & middle income peaked at 17.45 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0.0059 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1963.
Low & middle income ranks 3rd of 44 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Low & middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0065 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0777 current US$ per square kilometre | +1093.3% |
| 1963 | 0.0059 current US$ per square kilometre | -92.4% |
| 1964 | 0.1408 current US$ per square kilometre | +2273.2% |
| 1965 | 0.442 current US$ per square kilometre | +213.9% |
| 1966 | 0.4325 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1967 | 0.415 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 1968 | 0.112 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0841 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.9% |
| 1970 | 0.0589 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.9% |
| 1971 | 0.0925 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0621 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.9% |
| 1973 | 0.112 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.4% |
| 1974 | 0.2906 current US$ per square kilometre | +159.4% |
| 1975 | 0.7205 current US$ per square kilometre | +147.9% |
| 1976 | 0.4284 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.5% |
| 1977 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +191.5% |
| 1978 | 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.2% |
| 1979 | 0.8938 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.0% |
| 1980 | 2.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +143.6% |
| 1981 | 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1982 | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1983 | 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.9% |
| 1984 | 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1985 | 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.6% |
| 1986 | 2.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.5% |
| 1987 | 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1988 | 2.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1989 | 2.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.3% |
| 1990 | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.7% |
| 1991 | 2.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +146.7% |
| 1992 | 0.8743 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.8% |
| 1993 | 0.905 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1994 | 2.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +193.9% |
| 1995 | 5.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +104.6% |
| 1996 | 5.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1997 | 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 1998 | 3.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1999 | 4.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2000 | 3.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 2001 | 5.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.5% |
| 2002 | 4.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.2% |
| 2003 | 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.7% |
| 2004 | 4.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.6% |
| 2005 | 16.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +251.8% |
| 2006 | 14.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 2007 | 17.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.6% |
| 2008 | 16.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 2009 | 6.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.6% |
| 2010 | 7.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 2011 | 6.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.7% |
| 2012 | 6.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2013 | 6.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2014 | 8.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.7% |
| 2015 | 9.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.5% |
| 2016 | 12.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.3% |
| 2017 | 7.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.8% |
| 2018 | 6.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.4% |
| 2019 | 5.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 2020 | 7.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.1% |
| 2021 | 8.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 2022 | 13.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.7% |
| 2023 | 11.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1907 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0059 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.442 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.5534 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0589 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 3 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8743 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 9.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 7.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 10.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low & middle income
- 1 Palestine, State of 1,259 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 2 Lebanon 483.93 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 3 Albania 476.46 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 Bosnia and Herzegovina 401.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Cape Verde 371.13 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Maldives 335.25 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low & middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 881.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.39 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 6.97 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 37.22 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 4.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.76 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 8.96 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 11.79 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.74 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Low & middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Low & middle income was 11.3 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per recorded in Low & middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 17.45 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per recorded in Low & middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0059 current US$ per square kilometre in 1963.
- How does Low & middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
- Low & middle income ranks 3rd out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per rising or falling in Low & middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 65.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low & middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.