Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Middle income
Middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per was 5.9 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Middle income is 5.9 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 17.8% on the previous year and up 32.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Middle income peaked at 18.01 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007 and was at its lowest, -0.4046 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1992.
Middle income ranks 12th of 44 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0837 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | -0.0043 current US$ per square kilometre | -105.1% |
| 1964 | 0.1505 current US$ per square kilometre | -3600.0% |
| 1965 | 0.4908 current US$ per square kilometre | +226.2% |
| 1966 | 0.4765 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1967 | 0.4311 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 1968 | 0.1011 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.5% |
| 1969 | 0.098 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1970 | 0.1739 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.4% |
| 1971 | 0.0148 current US$ per square kilometre | -91.5% |
| 1972 | 0.0179 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 1973 | 0.0568 current US$ per square kilometre | +217.3% |
| 1974 | 0.2272 current US$ per square kilometre | +300.3% |
| 1975 | 0.0901 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.3% |
| 1976 | 0.2414 current US$ per square kilometre | +167.9% |
| 1977 | 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +473.4% |
| 1978 | 1.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.3% |
| 1979 | 0.8556 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.9% |
| 1980 | 2.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +174.1% |
| 1981 | 3.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.8% |
| 1982 | 2.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.0% |
| 1983 | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.1% |
| 1984 | 2.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1985 | 2.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.5% |
| 1986 | 2.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.9% |
| 1987 | 2.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1988 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1989 | 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.0% |
| 1990 | 0.001 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1991 | 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +166500.4% |
| 1992 | -0.4046 current US$ per square kilometre | -123.5% |
| 1993 | 0.0011 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.3% |
| 1994 | 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +146964.8% |
| 1995 | 4.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +178.6% |
| 1996 | 4.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1997 | 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.7% |
| 1998 | 3.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1999 | 3.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 2000 | 3.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 2001 | 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.2% |
| 2002 | 3.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.7% |
| 2003 | 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.0% |
| 2004 | 4.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.0% |
| 2005 | 16.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +320.4% |
| 2006 | 14.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 2007 | 18.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.8% |
| 2008 | 15.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 2009 | 4.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.7% |
| 2010 | 4.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 2011 | 3.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.8% |
| 2012 | 5.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.8% |
| 2013 | 4.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 2014 | 5.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 2015 | 3.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.3% |
| 2016 | 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 2017 | 4.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.0% |
| 2018 | 4.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 2019 | 3.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.8% |
| 2020 | 4.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 2021 | 5.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.9% |
| 2022 | 7.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.4% |
| 2023 | 5.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2031 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0043 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4908 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.488 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0148 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4046 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 8.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 5.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Middle income
- 9 Poland 270.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 Slovenia 183.22 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Montenegro 157.43 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Slovakia 137.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Serbia 128.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Georgia 126.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Ukraine 110.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 373.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 293.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.42 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 28.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 6.29 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.17 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.38 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 463.14 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 10.26 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Middle income was 5.9 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per recorded in Middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 18.01 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per recorded in Middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.4046 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992.
- How does Middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
- Middle income ranks 12th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per rising or falling in Middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 32.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.