Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per was 5.95 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
5.95 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 6.8%
Rank
11th
of 44 groups
All-time high
21.72 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2005
All-time low
-3.04 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1992
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Upper middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Upper middle income stood at 5.95 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 6.8% on the previous year and up 58.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Upper middle income peaked at 21.72 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, -3.04 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1992.
That places Upper middle income 11th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0017 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.002 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1964 | 0.0072 current US$ per square kilometre | +262.5% |
| 1965 | 0.3619 current US$ per square kilometre | +4896.5% |
| 1966 | 0.1079 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.2% |
| 1967 | 0.0205 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.0% |
| 1968 | 0.047 current US$ per square kilometre | +129.3% |
| 1969 | 0.0122 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.9% |
| 1970 | 0.1171 current US$ per square kilometre | +857.1% |
| 1971 | 0.023 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.4% |
| 1972 | 0.0347 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.1% |
| 1973 | 0.0442 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.3% |
| 1974 | 0.1783 current US$ per square kilometre | +303.4% |
| 1975 | -0.034 current US$ per square kilometre | -119.0% |
| 1976 | 0.1324 current US$ per square kilometre | -489.7% |
| 1977 | 0.255 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.6% |
| 1978 | 0.4815 current US$ per square kilometre | +88.8% |
| 1979 | 0.453 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 1980 | 2.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +478.1% |
| 1981 | 3.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.2% |
| 1982 | 2.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.4% |
| 1983 | 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.2% |
| 1984 | 2.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.8% |
| 1985 | 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.4% |
| 1986 | 2.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.4% |
| 1987 | 2.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1988 | 2.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1989 | 3.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.8% |
| 1990 | -0.1821 current US$ per square kilometre | -105.6% |
| 1991 | 0.202 current US$ per square kilometre | -211.0% |
| 1992 | -3.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -1604.1% |
| 1993 | -3.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1994 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -150.3% |
| 1995 | 4.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +196.7% |
| 1996 | 3.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 1997 | 2.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.2% |
| 1998 | 2.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1999 | 3.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.5% |
| 2000 | 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.9% |
| 2001 | 1.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.1% |
| 2002 | 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.6% |
| 2003 | 2.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.1% |
| 2004 | 2.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 2005 | 21.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +712.9% |
| 2006 | 8.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.8% |
| 2007 | 16.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +82.5% |
| 2008 | 19.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 2009 | 3.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.2% |
| 2010 | 3.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2011 | 3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2012 | 3.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2013 | 3.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 2014 | 3.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2015 | 3.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.8% |
| 2016 | 3.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 2017 | 4.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.8% |
| 2018 | 4.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2019 | 3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.1% |
| 2020 | 4.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 2021 | 5.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.2% |
| 2022 | 6.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.5% |
| 2023 | 5.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0623 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3619 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.1685 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.034 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4815 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 8.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 5.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 8 Republic of Moldova 274.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Poland 270.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 Slovenia 183.22 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Montenegro 157.43 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Slovakia 137.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Serbia 128.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Georgia 126.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Upper middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 264.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 114.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.36 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 24.06 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 518.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.80 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 607.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 175.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.85 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Upper middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Upper middle income was 5.95 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 21.72 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was -3.04 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992.
- How does Upper middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
- Upper middle income ranks 11th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 58.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.