Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Burundi
Burundi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 1,073 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
1,073 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 3.6%
World rank
4th
of 149 countries
All-time high
2,539 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2013
All-time low
113.32 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Burundi, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Burundi recorded 1,073 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is up 3.6% on the previous year and down 57.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Burundi peaked at 2,539 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013 and was at its lowest, 113.32 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1999.
That places Burundi 4th out of 149 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Burundi, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 260.9 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 332.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.6% |
| 1963 | 199.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1964 | 220.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1965 | 132.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.8% |
| 1966 | 192.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.9% |
| 1967 | 265.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.3% |
| 1968 | 304.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 1969 | 322.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1970 | 379.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 1971 | 394.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1972 | 497.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 1973 | 446.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 1974 | 478.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1975 | 633.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.4% |
| 1976 | 572.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1977 | 643.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1978 | 813.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.4% |
| 1979 | 980.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.5% |
| 1980 | 1,078 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1981 | 883.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.0% |
| 1982 | 803.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 1983 | 572.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.7% |
| 1984 | 633.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1985 | 747.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 1986 | 748.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1987 | 765.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1988 | 674.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.8% |
| 1989 | 668.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1990 | 1,539 current US$ per square kilometre | +130.3% |
| 1991 | 1,015 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.0% |
| 1992 | 2,059 current US$ per square kilometre | +102.8% |
| 1993 | 1,026 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.2% |
| 1994 | 745.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.3% |
| 1995 | 369.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.5% |
| 1996 | 266.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.8% |
| 1997 | 188.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.1% |
| 1998 | 296.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.1% |
| 1999 | 113.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.8% |
| 2000 | 232.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +105.5% |
| 2001 | 291.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.3% |
| 2002 | 643.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +120.6% |
| 2003 | 618.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 2004 | 976.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.9% |
| 2005 | 829.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 2006 | 1,298 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.5% |
| 2007 | 1,026 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.0% |
| 2008 | 2,265 current US$ per square kilometre | +120.8% |
| 2009 | 2,032 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 2010 | 2,215 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2011 | 2,486 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 2012 | 2,188 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 2013 | 2,539 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 2014 | 2,405 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 2015 | 1,897 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.1% |
| 2016 | 2,026 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2017 | 1,411 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.3% |
| 2018 | 1,616 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 2019 | 1,110 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.3% |
| 2020 | 1,091 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2021 | 1,417 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.9% |
| 2022 | 1,035 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.9% |
| 2023 | 1,073 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 248.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 132.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 332.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 584.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 379.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 980.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 757.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 572.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,078 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 761.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 113.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,059 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1,021 current US$ per square kilometre | 232.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,265 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1,989 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,110 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,539 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1,154 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,035 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,417 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Burundi
- 1 Palestine, State of 4,865 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 2 Rwanda 1,553 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 3 Sao Tome and Principe 1,469 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Lebanon 898.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Benin 263.23 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Dominica 254.38 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Burundi
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 142,904 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 27.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 64.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 10.83 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 18.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 20.86 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 23,544 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 20.08 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Burundi?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Burundi was 1,073 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Burundi?
- The highest recorded value was 2,539 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Burundi?
- The lowest recorded value was 113.32 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999.
- How does Burundi rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- Burundi ranks 4th out of 149 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in Burundi?
- Over the last ten years it is down 57.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Burundi data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.